Hot Ideas for a Cold Economy

Stockton Bankruptcy: Fat City’s Missed Opportunities

by on

My hometown just declared bankruptcy. No, not the town I was born in, and not the place I have lived most of my adult life, but where I grew up. Stockton, with a population of about 300,000 is the largest city in America to file for Chapter 9 protection. Conventional wisdom says it was the unfunded pension liability or mismanagement or too much debt, and under state guidelines for bankrupt cities, somebody has to take the blame. But the choices that led to this debacle go back decades.

When I left Stockton in the mid-1960s for college, it was a divided city. The affluent and mostly white people lived on the north side. The “others” lived to the east and south. Others were people who worked with their hands, people who picked the fields, people who worked the seasonal canneries. These were mostly low-wage workers, sometimes no-wage workers who turned fresh produce into food for supermarket shelves across the country.

The city was founded to provide groceries and provisions. During the gold rush the town was a supply depot on the edge of the San Joaquin River, where it outfitted miners headed for the foothills. During World War II it distributed war materials to the Pacific Theater. Then it headquartered thousands of field workers – braceros, the contract workers imported from Mexico – who cut asparagus and picked tomatoes.

But the city’s birthplace became its shame – the largest skid row for a city its size in the nation – turning the gold rush-era buildings made of brick and timber, with some of the best ironwork west of New Orleans, into a warren of flophouses and bars. So the city decided to bulldoze the ground flat, and start over. One year I returned to find a new bus terminal that looked like a spaceport from the Flintstones sitting at an intersection surrounded by rubble-strewn empty lots. Another year, river’s end featured a “boatel” – a motel that also had a wharf for pleasure boats to tie up so folks could spend the night. A few years later both were gone, belly up, demolished.

Stockton lost its port focus when the Army Corp of Engineers dug a tax-financed, deep-water channel up the Sacramento River to the capital. The rice and grains that had filled the ocean-going ships headed to Asia now went to Sacramento instead, leaving Stockton’s port to find another export, which it never did. Then the Navy decided to decrease the size of its operations, the Army decentralized its major distribution center and the trains didn’t have as many reasons to stop there anymore.

Meanwhile the city let the developers leave downtown for the north side, building wherever and whatever, and everyone disinvested from the remainder. Some of the most fertile cropland in the nation was covered with big-box stores and residential cul-de-sacs. Then in the rush of privatization, Stockton, which is surrounded by water, sold its water system to a corporation, which promised major infrastructure investments but now holds the city hostage — threatening to provide no water.

Too late, the city sold bonds to restore what was left of the old gold rush town, fixing up a few remnants and hoping gentrification would take care of the rest. It didn’t. So Stockton filed for bankruptcy.

It could have built on its assets. It could have recognized it agribusiness base and built on it as other Central Valley towns did. It could have built affordable housing and preserved neighborhoods for the folks who work low paying jobs. It could have saved its gold rush heritage, revered its Victorians, and become another Old Town like Pasadena. It could have kept its water.

Instead it followed the reigning conventional wisdom of whatever era – urban redevelopment by bulldozer, tax rebates for businesses that didn’t need them, city planning run by developers, municipal bonds for projects that promised a future built on illusions. The city either destroyed its assets or realized what it had lost long after it was too late. So sadly, whatever blame will be passed around, Stockton stands as a caution for all of us: Cities cannot buy a new future by ignoring their assets and forgetting their history.

Tags:

Rev. Jim Conn is the founding minister of the Church in Ocean Park and served on the Santa Monica City Council and as that city's mayor. He helped found Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, Los Angeles, and was its second chair, and was a founder of Santa Monica's renter's rights campaign.
  • guest

    Heard the Stockton story briefly on KPCC this week and, of course, thought of you repeatedly– and thought you could explain it aptly. You’ve read my mind…
    Sad unfolding, but thanks for sharing!
    Tav

  • Judy Abdo

    A very sad tale and totally predicatable.

  • Tom Griffith

    The sad thing is that most of those contemporaneously “correct” ideas were built on two foci: profit for the developers, and increased property tax income for the city. Cities could not get the latter until and unless they could find ways to provide the former. Most of the “good” decisions you suggested provide neither. The businesses that cater to the working class are not heavy sales tax providers (with the exception of large automobile dealerships, as opposed to small, independent used car lots). Proposition 13 made matters worse: agricultural property does not show a relatively high sales price per acre (as opposed to commercial or multiple-residential property) Thus, its re-assessment does not generate a lot of additional property tax.

    The saddest of all is that trying to change a community from working class to upper-middle class (the goal of gentrification) is a lot harder than to change a community from upper-middle class to working class, simply because there are about two working class persons for every middle- and upper-middle class person. (The myth of we all are middle-class came out of the post-WWII years, where working class wages approached the wage level of the middle class simply because WWII had destroyed the industrial infrastructure of all the other northern hemisphere nations. It hasn’t been true since 1970: in constant dollars, the earnings of working class people has been flat to slightly declining, every year. They know it, and they resent it.)

    There’s another myth that gets in the way: most people think that the higher the average class of the population, the better a city is. Laguna Beach is seen as a “better” town than El Toro or Santa Ana, even though both of the latter are bigger communities and have a higher tax base. Beverly Hills is seen as a higher average class community than Santa Monica, even though the latter has a higher property tax base. (Homes don’t sell as often in Beverly Hills; Beverly Hills real tax base is sales tax).

    What we in the church really need to do is to start debunking myths about cities, as well as about how so many of us are “middle class.” But of course, that isn’t politically correct.

    Sad, isn’t it.

  • Scott McVarish

    I wish other mid-size cities could read this post before they take their final steps along the Stockton Plan.

  • Mar Preston

    Thanks, Jim. Do you know there have been 33 murders this year alone in Stockton? You wonder how much the police force has been cut back. What a mess!

  • Anonymous

    Thanks, Jim. Your hometown’s misery seems a modern version
    of what Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States:
    1492 – Present” makes clear is our real history… the ongoing
    conflict between various wealthy elites and pretty much the rest
    of us, through a finely honed divide-and-conquer strategy. After
    reading Eric Foner’s fine book “The Fiery Trial…” on Lincoln and
    the Civil War, I am halfway through Zinn’s book. Truly riveting
    and sometimes hair-raising. These guys are helping me get
    a better handle on the why-and-how of our present fix, and
    maybe how it can change.

    Gene Partlow
    (Star says Hi)

  • Steve Goldman

    Yo Jim,

    Superb piece! I don’t pretend to understand the nuances of city planning, taxes, revenue bases, funding, finance, hedge funds (?) or whatever. But your very slick (best sense of the word is utterly convincing. What I DO know is that financial capitalism doesn’t work, is progressively destructive. Best,

    steve goldman