WebHot: Seniors Don’t Agree With Right’s Medicare Vision

by Frying Pan Staff on July 20, 2012

Within the padded walls of the House of Representatives, few agenda items consume more time than figuring out how to overturn President Obama’s health care reform law – and, looking down the road a little, how to scuttle Medicare as we know it. These two causes, along with countering the daily menace of Sharia law at the county courthouse, are what make certain conservatives get up early in the morning. Yet now a Commonwealth Fund survey shows that when it comes to Medicare, at least, most senior citizens are quite happy with the government-provided service they receive.

According to the survey, “Only eight percent of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 or older rated their insurance as fair or poor, compared with 20 percent of adults with employer-sponsored insurance and 33 percent of adults purchasing coverage in the individual market.”

Who would want to fix something so obviously not broken? Enter Congress. As reported by the Los Angeles Times, “Republicans, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney . . . want to convert Medicare into what they call a ‘premium support’ program that gives beneficiaries vouchers to buy a private insurance plan of their choosing.” Forget the ad speak about “premium support.” You could stop reading at “vouchers,” which is code for the privatization of government assets; throw in a little Bain juju, and you can see where the “party of ideas” would take Medicare – right off a cliff.

The Times quotes Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI), whose own Congressional health plan is completely paid for by the government, telling Human Events, “Choice and competition remain the only means by which costs can be brought under control without sacrificing quality.” He then dismissed Obama’s efforts to make Medicare more efficient as “a recipe for government rationing.”

Apparently seniors love such rationing, though, because as the Times noted, the Commonwealth Fund poll “found that elderly Americans feel they have much better access to medical care through Medicare than do Americans who rely on private coverage.”

Liberals are often accused of wishing to spread the wealth, but the Right’s abhorrence of a popular government program that works can only mean they want to spread the pain of those who suffer with inferior medical service.

Click twice to enlarge

Tags: Commonwealth Fund • Medicare

http://byrondennis.typepad.com/masshealthstats/ dennis byron

The CommonWealth Fund research referred to in this left wing blog is the most deceitful Medicare information ever released.

It is based on two-year-old data. Over 80% of the seniors surveyed by CommonWealth Fund volunteered that they depend on private insurance such as from a former employer or on a private Medigap or Medicare Part C plan but CommonWealth Fund says these opinions in favor of and overwhelming choice of private insurance over Medicare proves government-run Medicare is better than private insurance. What an absurd conclusion to reach after talking to hundreds of seniors who choose private insurance. (In fact, although Commonwealth Fund found — even though it didn’t ask — a group where more than 80% depended on some insurance other than Medicare, actually 94% of us seniors depend on such insurance.)

Medicare is terrible insurance. It has no catastrophic coverage, high deductibles for hospital admission, even higher co-pays for hospital observation and outpatient hospital treamtement or doctor visits, no drug/vision/annual-physical/dental coverage and severe geographic restrictions.

Seniors, do not be deceived by this Democratic Party propaganda put out by this Democratic Party think tank.

(By the way, lefties like sources. Most of the above is described right in the Methodology of the Commonwealth Fund research paper except the information about 94% of seniors choosing insurance other than traditional Medicare– that’s in the 2011 MedPAC Databook. The information about what Medicare covers is indisputable but if you insist, read “Medicare and You” on the Medicare web site.)
http://medicarebuz.com/elderauthority-com-announces-medicare-coverage-at-a-glance-infographic-2/ Medicare Buz » Blog Archive » ElderAuthority.com Announces 'Medicare Coverage at a Glance' Infographic

[...] Who would want to fix something so obviously not broken? Enter Congress. As reported by the Los Angeles Times, “Republicans, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney . . . want to convert Medicare into what they call a ‘premium support’ program that gives beneficiaries vouchers to buy a private insurance plan of their choosing.” Forget the ad speak about “premium support.” You could stop reading at “vouchers,” which is code for the privatization of government assets; throw in a little Bain juju, and you can see where the “party of ideas” would take Medicare – right off a cliff.Source: fryingpannews.org [...]
http://medicarebuz.com/the-consequences-of-missing-medicare-signup-2/ Medicare Buz » Blog Archive » The Consequences of Missing Medicare Signup

[...] Who would want to fix something so obviously not broken? Enter Congress. As reported by the Los Angeles Times, “Republicans, including former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney . . . want to convert Medicare into what they call a ‘premium support’ program that gives beneficiaries vouchers to buy a private insurance plan of their choosing.” Forget the ad speak about “premium support.” You could stop reading at “vouchers,” which is code for the privatization of government assets; throw in a little Bain juju, and you can see where the “party of ideas” would take Medicare – right off a cliff.Source: fryingpannews.org [...]